You’re about to connect actions to their reasons with precision. Start with parce que to explain everyday choices, then see how each causal conjunction shifts emphasis, tone, and position.

Start Quiz!

Causal conjunctions connect a consequence to its reason. They answer the question and introduce the idea that explains a fact, an action or a state. In , the cause is the illness and the consequence is staying at home. If you remove the causal conjunction, the two ideas remain separate and the logical link disappears. A causal conjunction is therefore used to construct a sentence where the second clause gives the motive of the first. It is very useful for organizing a clear explanation, as in the sentences that are also found with the Conjonctions de Subordination.

Usage neutre de la cause à l oral
UsageExplanation
😺Réponse spontanéeOn utilise « parce que » pour donner la cause la plus simple et la plus naturelle dans une réponse courante.
🏃Lien directOn choisit « parce que » quand on veut relier directement une action à sa cause sans ton particulier.
🎤Explication familièreOn emploie « parce que » dans une explication ordinaire, surtout à l oral ou dans un message simple.

is the most common causal conjunction. It introduces a complete clause and gives a direct, simple and neutral cause. We say , . The clause with most often comes after the main clause, because it explains what has just been stated. In speech, it is the most natural form to answer a question or justify an action. In a chain of sentences, it functions as a classic subordination conjunction: main clause + + complete clause.

Neutral usage of cause in speech
UsageExplanation
🐶Spontaneous responseWe use « parce que » to give the simplest and most natural cause in a common response.
🌧️Direct linkWe choose « parce que » when we want to directly connect an action to its cause without a particular tone.
🍰Familiar explanationWe use « parce que » in an ordinary explanation, especially in speech or in a simple message.

presents a cause considered as known, visible or already admitted by the other person. It is used when we do not discover the reason, but we recall it. , . The sentence with can precede or follow the main clause, but it often serves to start from a shared observation. The tone is more explanatory than . In a conversation, can also reinforce an obviousness, as in the Conjonctions de Coordination when one marks a logical relation between two ideas, but here the relation is causal.

Cause already known or obvious
UsageExplanation
🤖Admitted causeWe use « puisque » when the cause is already known or easily accepted by the listener.
🌙Shared factWe choose « puisque » to rely on a fact that everyone sees or recognizes.
🎂Calm justificationWe use « puisque » to justify a decision without giving the impression of defending oneself.

introduces the cause at the start of the sentence. It first announces the reason, then the consequence. We say or . This position at the beginning gives a more formal or more polished style than . The first clause explains the situation before the main action appears. does not start a short answer on its own; it is used to establish the context from the opening of the sentence.

Explication posée à l écrit
UsageExplanation
🚆Registre écritOn réserve « car » à un registre plus écrit ou plus réfléchi que la conversation spontanée.
🧦Justification développéeOn emploie « car » pour donner une explication calme qui soutient l idée principale.
🛋️Réponse non naturelleOn évite « car » dans une réponse courte et vive, car elle sonne souvent trop soutenue.

serves to introduce a justification, especially in writing. It connects two clauses and explains a previous statement: . The tone is calmer than . is not used at the start of a spontaneous answer and it remains less natural in ordinary spoken language. It is often found in explanatory text, an opinion, a letter or an argued sentence. It functions as a logical connective word, close to conjunctions of contrast by its place in discourse, but here it expresses a cause, not an opposition.

Explanation written
UsageExplanation
🐼Written registerWe reserve « car » for a more written or more thoughtful register than spontaneous conversation.
☕Developed justificationWe use « car » to give a calm explanation that supports the main idea.
🪑Unnatural replyWe avoid « car » in a short and lively answer, as it often sounds too formal.

presents a cause as a given fact. The construction is more formal and often more administrative or explanatory. We say or . This expression generally occupies the beginning of the sentence and prepares a logical conclusion. It is well suited to announcements, reports, instructions and formal explanations. It gives a strong cause, presented as an objective datum.

Formal and precise cause
Idea
🐭La proposition causale peut venir avant ou après la proposition principale.
💃Après une conjonction causale, on utilise une proposition complète avec un sujet et un verbe.
🔔Quand la cause est placée au début, on marque souvent une pause avec la virgule.

A causal conjunction always connects a full clause to another full clause. After , , , or , there is a subject and a verb. We say , and not a simple sequence of isolated words. The order can change depending on the conjunction. With and , the cause often comes after the main clause. With and , the cause is frequently placed before. With , both positions exist depending on the intended effect. This organization well prepares structures of Propositions et Subordonnées.

Choix selon le rôle de la cause
Idea
☀️On choisit la cause réelle quand on veut montrer le motif exact d un fait.
🐟On choisit une explication quand on veut surtout aider l interlocuteur à comprendre la situation.
🚀On choisit une justification quand on veut défendre ou appuyer une décision.

A real cause explains why something happens. presents a concrete fact. An explanation reformulates a situation to make it clear. gives the reason without trying to persuade. A justification defends a decision or an opinion. supports a position. The choice of the conjunction depends on the desired link. remains neutral and very common. relies on an evident fact. is well suited to justification. and place the cause in a more formal frame.

Take the Quiz!

You can now express causes, distinguish explanations from justifications, and place each clause naturally. Continue with Propositions et Subordonnées, then compare causal links with Conjonctions adversatives.

Prerequisites

Suggested Modules: A2

All content was written by our AI and may contain a few mistakes.

Last updated: Sun Sep 13, 2026, 1:56 AM