Burden of proof is the obligation placed on a party in a legal dispute to prove the facts and assertions they are relying on to win the case. It determines which side must present evidence and convince the court or jury of their version of events, and to what extent.
- The party with the burden of proof must produce sufficient evidence to support their claims.
- If that party fails to meet the required standard, they will lose—even if the opposing side does not present a strong counterargument.
- It ensures fairness by preventing cases from being decided solely on allegations without substantiation.
- Legal Doctrines
- Legal Reasoning
- Law
The burden of proof is the obligation to prove the claims made in a legal case.
How Burden of Proof Works
The burden of proof has two main components:
- Burden of production: The duty to present enough evidence to support a claim or defense so that it can be considered by the factfinder.
- Burden of persuasion: The duty to convince the factfinder that the evidence is sufficient to establish the claim to the required standard.
- Only the party bearing the burden of proof at each stage must produce and persuade with evidence.
- If that party fails, their claim or defense will be rejected—even if the other side does little or nothing.
The two components of the burden of proof are burden of production and burden of persuasion.
Who Bears the Burden of Proof?
- Plaintiffs/prosecutors: Usually bear the burden of proof because they initiate the case and allege wrongdoing.
- Defendants: May bear some burden if they raise affirmative defenses or counterclaims—but generally start off only needing to respond.
- The initial burden typically lies with the party making the claim (e.g., plaintiff in civil cases, prosecutor in criminal cases).
- If that party fails to meet the burden, the case will be dismissed or ended in their opponent’s favor.
The plaintiff usually bears the burden of proof in a civil lawsuit.
Standards of Proof
Different types of cases require different standards of proof—the level of certainty and evidence needed to meet the burden:
| Standard | Description | Common Use |
|---|---|---|
| Preponderance of the evidence | More likely than not (>50%) | Civil cases (plaintiffs’ burden) |
| Clear and convincing evidence | Highly probable/very substantial | Some civil cases (e.g., fraud, custody) |
| Beyond a reasonable doubt | Virtually certain; no reasonable doubt remains | Criminal cases (prosecutor’s burden) |
- The stricter the standard, the more evidence and conviction are needed to win.
- Criminal prosecution requires the highest standard to prevent wrongful convictions.
Criminal trials require proof beyond a reasonable doubt for conviction.
Examples
Civil Case
Situation: Plaintiff sues defendant for breach of contract.
- Who bears the burden of proof? Plaintiff
- Standard of proof? Preponderance of evidence
- What must the plaintiff prove?
- That a valid contract existed
- That the defendant breached the contract
- That the plaintiff suffered damages as a result
If the plaintiff proves these elements—and the evidence makes it more likely than not that the defendant breached the contract—they win. If not, the defendant wins.
The plaintiff must prove the breach of contract.
Criminal Case
Situation: Prosecutor charges defendant with robbery.
- Who bears the burden of proof? Prosecutor
- Standard of proof? Beyond a reasonable doubt
- What must the prosecutor prove?
- That the defendant took property unlawfully
- That the defendant had the intent to steal (mens rea)
- That the prosecution’s version is truthful and convincing enough to remove reasonable doubt
If the jury believes there is any reasonable doubt about the defendant’s guilt, the defendant must be acquitted.
If the prosecutor fails to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the defendant is acquitted.
Conclusion
The burden of proof is a cornerstone of legal fairness, dictating who must prove what, to whom, and by what standard.
- It starts with the party making the claim and varies by case type.
- Different standards of proof apply to civil and criminal cases, reflecting the seriousness of the allegations.
The burden of proof is important because it ensures fairness and prevents decisions based on mere allegations.
A plaintiff must prove all elements of the claim to the required standard.
Preponderance of the evidence is used in civil cases; beyond a reasonable doubt is used in criminal cases.